iSoftBet vs Endorphina: Provider Comparison

iSoftBet vs Endorphina: Provider Comparison

iSoftBet vs Endorphina side by side: the database lists 223 iSoftBet slots and 218 Endorphina slots. Their average stated RTP is 96.0% for iSoftBet versus 95.96% for Endorphina, while the volatility and bonus-buy figures show a different mix across the two catalogues.

iSoftBet vs Endorphina: quick verdict

Provider Slots in database Average stated RTP High or very high volatility Slots with bonus buy
iSoftBet 223 96.0% 43% 2%
Endorphina 218 95.96% 59% 57%

iSoftBet has five more slots in the database than Endorphina. Its average stated RTP is also marginally higher: 96.0% compared with 95.96%. RTP is an average theoretical return figure, not a prediction of results, and the RTP available for an individual game can differ between casino versions.

The larger contrast is in the catalogue mix. Endorphina has a higher share of slots rated high or very high volatility, at 59% compared with 43% for iSoftBet. Endorphina also has a much larger share of games with a listed bonus buy: 57% versus 2% for iSoftBet.

For a broader provider-to-provider comparison, see the site’s Comparisons.

Catalogue size and game types

The database contains 223 iSoftBet slots and 218 Endorphina slots. On this count, iSoftBet has the larger catalogue, although the difference is small.

The supplied data does not include a breakdown of either catalogue by theme, reel layout, pay mechanic or game type. As a result, this comparison does not assign either provider a specific strength in those areas. The available comparison points are catalogue size, average stated RTP, volatility mix, bonus-buy share and the supplied max-win field.

The catalogue total is a database count. It does not by itself indicate how many games are currently available in a particular jurisdiction or on a particular gaming platform.

RTP comparison

The average stated RTP figures are:

  • iSoftBet: 96.0%
  • Endorphina: 95.96%

On the supplied averages, iSoftBet is higher by 0.04 percentage points. This is a comparison of the stated database averages, not a guarantee for every game. Individual slots can have their own RTP setting, and RTP can differ between casino versions, so the in-game information screen is the appropriate place to confirm a specific title’s setting.

An RTP comparison is most useful when read alongside volatility. RTP does not describe how frequently wins occur or how large individual outcomes may be. The available volatility figures show that the two catalogues have different proportions of high and very high volatility slots.

Volatility mix

The database rates 43% of iSoftBet slots as high or very high volatility. The equivalent figure for Endorphina is 59%.

This means Endorphina has the larger share of games in these two higher-volatility categories. It does not mean that every Endorphina slot has high volatility, or that every iSoftBet slot has lower volatility. The percentages describe the composition of each provider’s catalogue.

The data does not provide a full low-, medium- and high-volatility breakdown, so no further split can be stated. Check the individual game information for the volatility rating of a particular slot.

Signature features

The supplied comparison data identifies bonus-buy availability as a catalogue-level feature. It does not provide a complete list of recurring mechanics, themes or feature combinations for either provider.

Bonus buy

A bonus buy is listed for 2% of iSoftBet slots and 57% of Endorphina slots in the database. On this measure, bonus buys are much more common in the Endorphina catalogue.

These percentages do not indicate the price, rules or structure of a bonus buy. Those details are not included in the supplied data and should be checked in the individual game’s information screen where available.

Megaways and cluster pays

No figures or game-level data for Megaways or cluster pays are supplied for either provider. This page therefore does not make a claim about how often either mechanic appears in the iSoftBet or Endorphina catalogue.

Max win

Top max-win figures are not listed in the supplied comparison data for either provider. Because there is no verified max-win value here, neither provider is assigned a max-win advantage.

For a particular slot, check the game’s information screen for the stated maximum win and any related conditions. Do not treat a provider-level catalogue comparison as a substitute for the rules of an individual game.

Top iSoftBet slots

No individual iSoftBet game names or game-level ranking data are included in the source row. Therefore, a verified list of top iSoftBet slots cannot be produced from this comparison alone.

The available provider-level facts are that iSoftBet has 223 slots, an average stated RTP of 96.0%, a 43% share of high or very high volatility slots and a 2% share of slots with a bonus buy. To review the provider’s catalogue, use explore iSoftBet Slots.

Top Endorphina slots

The supplied data does not name individual Endorphina games or provide a ranking method. It is therefore not possible to identify top Endorphina slots without adding information that is not present in the database row.

The verified catalogue figures are 218 slots, an average stated RTP of 95.96%, a 59% share of high or very high volatility slots and a 57% share of slots with a bonus buy. These statistics describe the catalogue mix rather than the performance of any individual game. You can browse more endorphina Slots to compare listed titles using their individual game data.

FAQ

Which has more slots, iSoftBet or Endorphina?

iSoftBet has 223 slots in the database, while Endorphina has 218.

Which has a higher average RTP, iSoftBet or Endorphina?

The average stated RTP is 96.0% for iSoftBet and 95.96% for Endorphina. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the individual game’s information screen for the applicable figure.

Which makes more high-volatility slots?

Endorphina has the higher share: 59% of its slots are rated high or very high volatility, compared with 43% of iSoftBet slots. For more provider catalogue data, review iSoftBet’s listed games.

Which offers more bonus-buy slots?

Endorphina offers more by the database share: 57% of its slots include a bonus buy, compared with 2% of iSoftBet slots.

Is iSoftBet’s average RTP much higher than Endorphina’s?

No. The stated averages are close: 96.0% for iSoftBet and 95.96% for Endorphina, a difference of 0.04 percentage points. These are catalogue averages, not guarantees for individual games.

Which provider has the higher top max win?

The supplied data does not list a top max-win figure for either iSoftBet or Endorphina. Check each game’s information screen for its stated maximum win. For a wider comparison of provider data, browse more comparisons.

Does Endorphina have more bonus buys because it has more slots?

The data shows that Endorphina has both a higher bonus-buy share, at 57% versus 2%, and a slightly smaller catalogue, at 218 versus 223 slots. It does not establish why the shares differ.

Are Megaways or cluster pays more common with either provider?

The supplied row contains no Megaways or cluster-pay counts for either provider, so no comparison can be made.

18+ only. Play responsibly; demos use virtual credits and no real money.