BGaming vs Habanero: Provider Comparison

BGaming vs Habanero side by side: the database lists 234 BGaming slots and 140 Habanero slots. Average stated RTP is 96.46% for BGaming and 96.8% for Habanero, while the volatility and bonus-buy mixes differ considerably. This comparison covers the available catalogue counts, RTP figures, volatility shares, bonus buys and listed max-win data.

BGaming vs Habanero: quick verdict

BGaming has the larger catalogue in this database, with 234 slots compared with Habanero’s 140. Habanero has the higher average stated RTP at 96.8%, versus 96.46% for BGaming. These are catalogue averages, not guarantees for every title, and RTP can differ between casino versions of the same game.

The volatility mix also separates the providers. High or very high volatility applies to 74% of BGaming slots and 56% of Habanero slots. BGaming has the larger share of games with a bonus buy: 78%, compared with 11% for Habanero.

For a wider view of provider pages and other comparisons, visit the site’s Comparisons.

Catalogue size and game types

The database contains 234 BGaming slots and 140 Habanero slots, giving BGaming the larger recorded catalogue. The difference is 94 listed games, although catalogue counts can change as new games are added or database records are updated.

The supplied data does not break either catalogue down into specific themes, mechanics or game counts by type. As a result, this comparison does not assign a provider an advantage for a particular theme or format. The available comparison points are catalogue size, average stated RTP, volatility mix and bonus-buy availability.

The game-type data also does not provide a verified count for Megaways games, cluster-pays games or other individual mechanics. Those details should be checked on the relevant game page or in the in-game information screen before comparing specific titles.

RTP comparison

Habanero has the higher average stated RTP in the supplied database:

• BGaming: 96.46% average stated RTP
• Habanero: 96.8% average stated RTP

The difference between the two stated averages is 0.34 percentage points. This is a catalogue-level comparison and should not be treated as the RTP of every game from either provider. Individual casino versions can use different RTP settings, so check the game’s information screen for the version being played.

RTP is only one comparison point. It does not describe how frequently a game pays, the size of individual results or how the game’s volatility feels in practice. Those characteristics are represented separately here by the volatility data, where available.

Volatility mix

The database rates 74% of BGaming’s slots as high or very high volatility. Habanero’s corresponding share is 56%.

This means BGaming has the larger recorded proportion in the combined high and very high volatility categories. It does not mean every BGaming slot has high volatility, nor that every Habanero slot has lower volatility. The figures describe each provider’s share across the listed catalogue.

The supplied data does not give a full breakdown between low, medium, high and very high volatility. Therefore, the comparison cannot state how many games fall into each individual category. For a specific title, use the volatility rating shown on its game page and confirm it in the game’s information screen if needed.

Signature features

The supplied row identifies bonus-buy availability and provides a separate prompt for Megaways and cluster pays, but it does not list provider-wide feature counts beyond the bonus-buy figures. Specific feature claims should therefore be made at individual game level rather than applied to every slot from a provider.

Bonus buy

Bonus buys appear in 78% of BGaming slots in the database and 11% of Habanero slots. BGaming therefore has the larger recorded share of slots that include this feature.

A bonus buy is not confirmed for every game, and availability may depend on the game version or the jurisdiction in which it is offered. Check the individual game’s feature list and in-game information screen. The supplied data does not state prices, conditions or availability for any bonus buy.

Megaways and cluster pays

No verified counts for Megaways or cluster-pays games are included in the supplied data. This means the comparison cannot identify which provider has more games using either mechanic.

When comparing a particular title, check its feature description rather than inferring mechanics from the provider name. The database figures here support comparisons of catalogue size, RTP averages, volatility shares and bonus-buy shares only.

Max win

Top max-win figures are not listed for either provider in the supplied comparison data. The stats table therefore records max win as unavailable for both BGaming and Habanero.

A max win should be checked on the individual slot’s page or in its in-game information screen. No provider-level max-win comparison can be made from the supplied figures.

Top BGaming slots

No individual BGaming game names or game-level rankings are included in this comparison row. It is therefore not possible to identify or rank “top” BGaming slots without adding unsupported information.

The available provider-level facts are that the database contains 234 BGaming slots, the average stated RTP is 96.46%, 74% are rated high or very high volatility, and 78% include a bonus buy. These figures describe the catalogue as a whole rather than selecting a particular title.

For the provider’s catalogue, see BGaming Slots. Compare each game’s own RTP, volatility, feature list and max-win entry, because catalogue averages do not determine the specifications of an individual slot.

Top Habanero slots

No named Habanero games or verified ranking criteria are supplied here. This comparison therefore does not label any Habanero slot as the best or top title.

The database records 140 Habanero slots, an average stated RTP of 96.8%, a 56% share rated high or very high volatility and an 11% share including a bonus buy. These are aggregate catalogue figures and are not specifications for every Habanero game.

For the available provider catalogue, see explore habanero Slots. Individual game pages and in-game information screens should be used to confirm title-specific RTP, volatility, features and max win.

FAQ

Which has more slots, BGaming or Habanero?

BGaming has 234 slots in the database, while Habanero has 140. BGaming therefore has the larger listed catalogue.

Which has a higher average RTP, BGaming or Habanero?

Habanero has the higher average stated RTP at 96.8%, compared with 96.46% for BGaming. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the in-game information screen for the specific version.

Which makes more high-volatility slots?

BGaming has the larger share rated high or very high volatility: 74% of its listed slots, compared with 56% of Habanero’s. For a broader way to compare providers, use the catalogue comparison.

Which offers more bonus buy slots?

BGaming offers the larger recorded share of bonus-buy slots. The feature is included in 78% of BGaming slots and 11% of Habanero slots in the database.

Are the RTP figures for every game?

No. The supplied figures are average stated RTP values for each provider’s listed catalogue: 96.46% for BGaming and 96.8% for Habanero. Individual game RTP can differ, and casino versions may use different RTP settings.

Are max-win figures available in this comparison?

No. A top max win is not listed for either BGaming or Habanero in the supplied data. Check the individual game page or its in-game information screen for title-specific information.

18+ only. Play responsibly; demos use virtual credits and no real money.