BGaming vs Endorphina: Provider Comparison

BGaming vs Endorphina side by side: the database lists 234 BGaming slots and 218 Endorphina slots, with average stated RTP of 96.46% and 95.96%, respectively. The comparison also covers volatility, bonus-buy availability and the available catalogue data.

BGaming vs Endorphina: quick verdict

BGaming has the larger catalogue in this database: 234 listed slots compared with 218 for Endorphina. It also has the higher average stated RTP, at 96.46% versus 95.96%.

The clearest difference is in the distribution of volatility and bonus-buy availability. High or very high volatility is recorded for 74% of BGaming slots and 59% of Endorphina slots. Bonus buys are listed for 78% of BGaming slots and 57% of Endorphina slots.

These figures describe the database entries and averages, not the result of any individual spin. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the in-game information screen for the exact version available to you. For a separate catalogue view, use Back to Comparisons.

Catalogue size and game types

BGaming leads on the number of listed slots, with 16 more games than Endorphina in the database. That makes BGaming the larger catalogue for this comparison, although the difference is relatively narrow compared with the total number of entries.

The supplied data does not provide a complete breakdown of game types for either provider. It therefore does not support a precise comparison of themes, reel layouts, paylines, cluster mechanics or other categories across the full catalogues.

The same limitation applies to the names of individual games. No title list or game-by-game selection is included in the comparison data, so specific games cannot be ranked or labelled as the top choices from these figures alone. The full BGaming Slots catalogue can be used to inspect the provider’s listed games directly.

Catalogue size is useful as a starting point, but it does not measure game quality or suitability. It only shows how many titles are represented in the database. A larger catalogue may offer more choice, while a smaller one may still contain the particular mechanics or volatility profile a reader is looking for.

RTP comparison

The average stated RTP is 96.46% for BGaming and 95.96% for Endorphina. On the supplied averages, BGaming is higher by 0.50 percentage points.

RTP, or return to player, is a theoretical percentage calculated over a large number of plays. It is not a promise of return on a particular session and does not indicate what will happen on an individual spin. The figures here are provider-level database averages, rather than a stated RTP for every individual slot.

The comparison also does not include a distribution of RTP values within either catalogue. As a result, it cannot show how many games sit above or below either provider’s average, nor can it identify which individual titles have the highest stated RTP.

RTP can differ between casino versions of the same game. Before comparing a specific title, check its in-game information screen for the displayed RTP. This is especially important when using an average as a catalogue-level guide, because the average does not replace the specification for an individual game.

For readers comparing BGaming or Endorphina, the practical distinction is straightforward: the supplied average is higher for BGaming, but the figures do not establish a result for any particular slot.

Volatility mix

Volatility describes how frequently and how unevenly a slot’s results may be distributed. The supplied database groups games into volatility ratings, including high and very high categories. It does not provide a full count for every individual volatility level.

BGaming has a high-or-very-high volatility share of 74%. Endorphina’s corresponding share is 59%. The difference is 15 percentage points, meaning the BGaming catalogue has the larger recorded proportion in these two higher-volatility categories.

This does not mean that every BGaming slot is high volatility or that Endorphina has no high-volatility games. The figures are catalogue shares, so each provider also has entries outside the high and very high grouping. The exact split between low, medium and other ratings is not listed.

Volatility should be read separately from RTP. A slot can have a stated RTP, but that percentage does not explain the timing or distribution of individual results. The available figures allow a comparison of the two providers’ recorded volatility mixes; they do not identify which provider is better for a particular playing preference.

Signature features

The available comparison data gives one quantified feature: bonus-buy availability. It does not provide a full feature inventory for either provider, so features such as free spins, multipliers, jackpots or expanding symbols cannot be compared from this row.

Bonus buy

Bonus buys are listed for 78% of BGaming slots and 57% of Endorphina slots. BGaming therefore has the higher recorded share, with a difference of 21 percentage points.

These percentages indicate how many database entries include a bonus buy. They do not state the price of any bonus buy, the conditions attached to it, or whether the feature is available in every version of a game. Those details are not listed and should be checked in the game’s information screen.

Bonus-buy availability also does not determine RTP or volatility by itself. It is a separate catalogue attribute in this comparison.

Megaways and cluster pays

The supplied row contains no figures confirming how many BGaming or Endorphina slots use Megaways, cluster pays or another specific winning mechanic. No provider-level comparison for these features can therefore be made without adding information outside the database row.

Max win

Top max-win figures are not listed for either provider in the supplied data. The comparison cannot identify which catalogue has the higher maximum win or name a title with the largest potential multiplier.

A max win is a game-specific specification, so it should be checked on the individual slot’s information screen. It should not be inferred from catalogue size, RTP, volatility or bonus-buy share.

Top BGaming slots

No individual BGaming game names or max-win values are supplied in this comparison row. It is therefore not possible to create a verified ranking of top BGaming slots from the available data.

The database does establish three catalogue-level points about BGaming:

• It lists 234 slots.
• The average stated RTP is 96.46%.
• High or very high volatility is recorded for 74% of the catalogue.
• Bonus buys are listed for 78% of the catalogue.

These figures describe the provider’s catalogue as a whole and should not be treated as specifications for every BGaming title. To compare individual games, check each title’s RTP, volatility, bonus-buy status and any available max-win information separately.

Top Endorphina slots

The supplied data does not include individual Endorphina game names, title-level RTP values or max-win figures. A verified ranking of “top” Endorphina slots cannot be made from the provider totals alone.

The available catalogue-level facts are:

• It lists 218 slots.
• The average stated RTP is 95.96%.
• High or very high volatility is recorded for 59% of the catalogue.
• Bonus buys are listed for 57% of the catalogue.

Readers can explore Endorphina Slots to review the provider’s listed games. For any individual title, use the in-game information screen because the comparison row does not supply game-specific specifications.

FAQ

Which has more slots, BGaming or Endorphina?

BGaming has more slots in the database: 234 compared with 218 for Endorphina.

Which has a higher average RTP, BGaming or Endorphina?

BGaming has the higher average stated RTP, at 96.46% compared with Endorphina’s 95.96%. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the in-game information screen for the exact figure.

Which makes more high-volatility slots?

74% of BGaming slots and 59% of Endorphina slots are rated high or very high volatility. For a closer look at the available titles, browse the catalogue differences before checking individual game specifications.

Which offers more bonus-buy slots?

BGaming has the higher recorded share: 78% of its slots include a bonus buy, compared with 57% of Endorphina slots.

Is BGaming’s RTP higher on every slot?

That is not established by the supplied data. The figures are provider-level average stated RTP values, not a list of every individual game’s RTP. Check the information screen for each slot.

Does Endorphina have no high-volatility slots?

No. The data states that 59% of Endorphina slots are rated high or very high volatility. The figure is a catalogue share, not an indication that the remaining games have one specific volatility rating.

Does a bonus buy mean a slot has a higher RTP?

The supplied data does not establish that relationship. It only records the share of slots that include a bonus buy. RTP and bonus-buy availability should be checked as separate specifications.

Which provider has the higher max win?

This cannot be determined from the supplied row. Top max-win figures are not listed for either BGaming or Endorphina, so individual game information screens are needed.

18+ only. Play responsibly; demos use virtual credits and no real money.