Red Tiger vs Blueprint Gaming: Provider Comparison

Red Tiger vs Blueprint Gaming: quick verdict

Red Tiger has the larger catalogue in this database, with 339 slots compared with Blueprint Gaming’s 165. Blueprint Gaming has the slightly higher average stated RTP at 95.87%, while Red Tiger’s is 95.82%; RTP can differ between casino versions, so check a game’s in-game information screen for its current figure.

The volatility and bonus-buy shares also differ: 80% of Red Tiger slots are rated high or very high volatility, compared with 45% of Blueprint Gaming slots. Bonus buys appear in 22% of Red Tiger’s catalogue and 34% of Blueprint Gaming’s. These figures describe the database entries, not every game a provider may offer.

Use the figures as a side-by-side snapshot rather than a ranking of overall quality: catalogue size, average RTP, volatility mix and bonus-buy availability measure different things. For more provider comparisons, browse the comparisons catalogue.

Catalogue size and game types

Red Tiger has 174 more slots listed than Blueprint Gaming in the database: 339 versus 165. That makes Red Tiger the larger catalogue in this comparison, but the count alone does not show which provider has more games matching a particular theme or play style.

The supplied data does not break down either catalogue by game type, theme or individual title. If you are comparing a specific kind of slot, check the provider catalogue and the game’s own information rather than assuming the overall count tells you what is available. You can explore Red Tiger slots or view Blueprint Gaming slots.

RTP comparison

Blueprint Gaming has the higher average stated RTP in this dataset: 95.87%, against Red Tiger’s 95.82%. The difference is 0.05 percentage points. These are catalogue averages, not RTP figures for every individual slot.

RTP can differ between casino versions of the same game. A provider-level average therefore cannot confirm the RTP of a specific title or version. Check the in-game information screen for the figure that applies to the version you are viewing.

Volatility mix

The database rates 80% of Red Tiger slots as high or very high volatility. The same rating applies to 45% of Blueprint Gaming slots. On this measure, Red Tiger has the larger share of games in the high or very high categories.

The figures do not give a complete volatility breakdown, such as the shares rated low or medium, and they do not identify the volatility of individual games. For a particular slot, use its listed game details; do not treat the provider-wide percentage as the rating for every title.

Signature features

The supplied comparison data gives figures for bonus-buy availability, but it does not provide a complete feature breakdown for either provider. The sections below separate what the database confirms from details that are not listed.

Bonus buy

A bonus buy is listed for 22% of Red Tiger slots and 34% of Blueprint Gaming slots. Blueprint Gaming therefore has the higher share in this dataset, despite having fewer games overall.

The percentages do not identify which titles include the option, and availability can depend on the game version. Check an individual game’s details and in-game information screen before relying on a feature being present.

Megaways and cluster pays

The supplied data does not state how many Red Tiger or Blueprint Gaming slots use Megaways or cluster-pay mechanics. No provider comparison or count for these features can be confirmed from the figures available here.

For those mechanics, consult the information for the individual title rather than inferring availability from the provider name or catalogue size.

Max win

A top max win is not listed for either provider in the supplied data. That means there is no verified provider-level figure to compare here. Check the information screen for an individual slot for any max-win figure and related conditions.

Top Red Tiger slots

The supplied data does not name individual Red Tiger titles, so it is not possible to produce a verified list of top games from this comparison alone. “Top” can also refer to different criteria; no ranking measure or title-level data is provided here.

For a title-by-title check, use the Red Tiger slots catalogue and review each game’s listed specifications. The provider-level figures in this article—339 games, an average stated RTP of 95.82%, an 80% high or very high volatility share, and a 22% bonus-buy share—should not be applied to every individual slot.

Top Blueprint Gaming slots

No individual Blueprint Gaming titles are named in the supplied data, and there is no ranking criterion for identifying “top” games. A title list would therefore go beyond the verified information available for this page.

The Blueprint Gaming slots catalogue is the place to check individual entries. The comparison records 165 games, an average stated RTP of 95.87%, a 45% high or very high volatility share, and a 34% bonus-buy share; these are catalogue-level figures, not specifications for each game.

FAQ

Which has more slots, Red Tiger or Blueprint Gaming?

Red Tiger has 339 slots in the database, compared with 165 for Blueprint Gaming.

Which has a higher average RTP, Red Tiger or Blueprint Gaming?

Blueprint Gaming has the higher average stated RTP: 95.87%, compared with Red Tiger’s 95.82%. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the game’s in-game information screen for its specific figure.

Which makes more high-volatility slots?

The database rates 80% of Red Tiger slots and 45% of Blueprint Gaming slots as high or very high volatility. For more provider comparisons, compare the catalogue figures.

Which offers more bonus-buy slots?

By share of catalogue, Blueprint Gaming is higher: 34% of its slots include a bonus buy, compared with 22% of Red Tiger slots. The supplied data does not list the individual titles with this feature.

18+ only. Play responsibly; demos use virtual credits and no real money.