Endorphina vs Gamomat: Provider Comparison

Endorphina vs Gamomat side by side: 218 vs 195 slots, average RTP 95.96% vs 96.11%. This comparison also looks at the volatility mix, bonus buy figures and the available top max win data. See the wider Back to Comparisons catalogue for other provider matchups.

Endorphina vs Gamomat: quick verdict

Endorphina has the larger catalogue in this database, with 218 slots compared with 195 for Gamomat. Gamomat has the higher average stated RTP at 96.11%, while Endorphina’s average stated RTP is 95.96%.

The volatility mix differs more clearly. High or very high volatility applies to 59% of Endorphina slots and 48% of Gamomat slots. Bonus buys are also much more common in the Endorphina catalogue: 57% of its slots include one, compared with 1% of Gamomat slots.

The figures show different catalogue profiles, but they do not establish that one provider is better overall. RTP can differ between casino versions, so the in-game information screen remains the relevant source for the specific version being played.

Catalogue size and game types

Endorphina leads this database by 23 listed slots: 218 compared with Gamomat’s 195. That makes Endorphina the larger catalogue for this comparison, although the difference is measured only across the games recorded here.

The supplied data does not provide a detailed count of themes, mechanics or individual game types for either provider. As a result, this page does not assign either catalogue a broader range of themes or features without supporting figures.

The useful distinction from the available data is structural:

• Endorphina has more listed slots.
• Gamomat has the higher average stated RTP.
• Endorphina has the larger share of high or very high volatility slots.
• Endorphina has the larger share of slots with a bonus buy.

For a complete provider-by-provider list, browse the more Endorphina Slots in the database.

RTP comparison

Gamomat has the higher average stated RTP in this dataset: 96.11% versus 95.96% for Endorphina. The difference is 0.15 percentage points.

RTP is a theoretical return figure calculated over a large number of spins, not a prediction of the result of an individual session. The database values are averages for the stated provider catalogues, so they should be used for comparison rather than treated as a guarantee.

The phrase “stated RTP” is important because the RTP shown for a game can differ between casino versions. Check the individual game’s information screen for the applicable RTP before comparing a specific slot. The available row data does not list the RTP of individual games, only the provider averages.

Volatility mix

Endorphina has the higher share of slots rated high or very high volatility. The figure is 59% for Endorphina and 48% for Gamomat, a difference of 11 percentage points.

Volatility describes how a slot’s results are distributed over time. A higher-volatility rating generally indicates a greater emphasis on less frequent, more variable outcomes, while a lower rating indicates a different distribution. The rating itself does not predict the result of the next spin.

This comparison uses the database’s combined “high or very high” category. It does not provide a separate percentage for high volatility and very high volatility, so those categories should not be treated as separate provider totals here.

Signature features

The supplied comparison data identifies bonus-buy prevalence and volatility as the main feature differences. It does not provide a complete feature count for either provider, so individual mechanics are covered only where the row supplies a figure.

Bonus buy

Bonus buys appear in 57% of Endorphina slots and 1% of Gamomat slots in this database. On this measure, bonus-buy inclusion is substantially more common among the listed Endorphina games.

A bonus-buy percentage indicates how many catalogue entries include the feature. It does not state the price, availability in a particular jurisdiction or whether the feature is enabled in every casino version. Those details are not listed and should be checked in the game information screen.

Megaways and cluster pays

No Megaways or cluster-pays counts are supplied for either provider. The comparison therefore cannot identify which catalogue contains more of these mechanics.

The absence of a figure here is not evidence that either provider does or does not use a particular mechanic. It means only that the supplied database row does not include a verified comparison for these categories.

Max win

Top max win values are not listed for Endorphina or Gamomat in the supplied data. No max-win comparison can therefore be made.

Max win is a game-specific specification, so a provider-level conclusion would require the values for the individual slots being compared. Check the in-game information screen for a game’s listed maximum win.

Top Endorphina slots

The row does not provide individual Endorphina game names, max-win values or a ranking method. This page therefore does not label particular Endorphina titles as top games or claim that one title outranks another.

What can be verified is the provider-level profile: Endorphina has 218 listed slots, an average stated RTP of 95.96%, 59% rated high or very high volatility and 57% including a bonus buy. Use the provider catalogue to inspect individual game specifications and confirm each title’s RTP, volatility and features in its information screen.

Top Gamomat slots

Individual Gamomat titles are not supplied in the comparison row, and neither are their max-win values or a ranking criterion. No evidence-based list of top Gamomat games can be created from the available data.

The verified catalogue figures are 195 listed slots, an average stated RTP of 96.11%, 48% rated high or very high volatility and 1% including a bonus buy. The more Gamomat Slots catalogue can be used to review the listed games individually.

FAQ

Which has more slots, Endorphina or Gamomat?

Endorphina has 218 slots in the database, while Gamomat has 195.

Which has a higher average RTP, Endorphina or Gamomat?

Gamomat has the higher average stated RTP: 96.11% compared with Endorphina’s 95.96%. RTP can differ between casino versions, so check the individual game’s information screen.

Which provider makes more high-volatility slots?

Endorphina has the larger share of slots rated high or very high volatility: 59% compared with 48% for Gamomat. For the full Endorphina catalogue, see these provider details.

Which offers more bonus buy slots?

Endorphina does. Bonus buys are included in 57% of Endorphina slots and 1% of Gamomat slots in the database.

Does Endorphina or Gamomat have the higher max win?

The top max win is not listed for either provider, so the data does not support a comparison. Check the in-game information screen for the max win of a specific slot.

Are the RTP figures guaranteed for every slot?

No individual-slot RTP figures are supplied here. The listed values are provider average stated RTP figures, and RTP can differ between casino versions. Check the relevant game information screen.

Does the larger catalogue mean Endorphina is better?

No. Endorphina has more listed slots, with 218 compared with 195, but catalogue size alone does not establish overall quality or suitability. The comparison also shows that Gamomat has the higher average stated RTP, while Endorphina has higher shares of high or very high volatility and bonus-buy slots.

18+ only. Play responsibly; demos use virtual credits and no real money.